yellowstone: be in state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.58
, national parks
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, park
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.29
, central park
Weight: 0.29
, other place
Weight: 0.29
, national forest
Weight: 0.28
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in state 1.00
has state jobs 0.78
has state name 0.77
be in honduras 0.77
be in burnaby 0.77
be in state of emergency 0.77
has state fire 0.77
be important in states 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(national parks, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(national parks, has state jobs)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(national parks, has state jobs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(central park, be in burnaby)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(national parks, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(central park, be in burnaby)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(central park, be in burnaby)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(yellowstone, be in state)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state of emergency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(yellowstone, be in state of emergency)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be in state of emergency)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in state of emergency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(national parks, has state jobs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(central park, be in burnaby)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(national parks, has state jobs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(yellowstone, be in state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)