york: be called melting pot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.40
, washington
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, london
Weight: 0.34
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called melting pot 1.00
was called melting pot 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(york, be called melting pot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(new york, was called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(york, be called melting pot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(new york, was called melting pot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new york, be called melting pot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new york, was called melting pot)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called melting pot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was called melting pot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(new york, was called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(york, be called melting pot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(new york city, was called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york city, was called melting pot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(york, be called melting pot)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(york, was called melting pot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(york, was called melting pot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(york, was called melting pot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(york, was called melting pot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(york, be called melting pot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new york, was called melting pot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(new york, be called melting pot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(new york city, was called melting pot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new york, was called melting pot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(york, be called melting pot)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(new york, be called melting pot)