york: be popular for tourists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.40
, washington
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, london
Weight: 0.34
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular for tourists 1.00
is popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(york, be popular for tourists)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(new york, is popular)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(york, be popular for tourists)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new york, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(city, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(city, is popular)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(london, be popular for tourists)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(new york, is popular)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(london, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(london, be popular for tourists)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(new york city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york city, is popular)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(philadelphia, is popular)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is popular)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mexico city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(york, be popular for tourists)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(york, is popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(york, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(york, is popular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(york, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(york, be popular for tourists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(new york, is popular)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(london, be popular for tourists)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new york city, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(new york, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(york, be popular for tourists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is popular)