york: be referred as big apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.40
, washington
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, london
Weight: 0.34
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred as big apple 1.00
be referred as apple 0.97
be known as big apple 0.95
be called big apple 0.94
called big apple 0.94
get called big apple 0.93
be called big apple state 0.93
is big apple 0.92
be known as apple 0.91
be called apple 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york, be called big apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new york, be called big apple state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(city, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(city, be called apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york, be called big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(new york, be called big apple state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be known as apple)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(city, be called apple)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called big apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called big apple state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is big apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york, be called big apple)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new york, be called big apple state)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(city, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(new york city, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called big apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, is big apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, is big apple)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called apple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(york, be referred as big apple)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(york, be referred as apple)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(york, be called big apple)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(york, be called big apple state)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(york, be referred as apple)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(york, be referred as apple)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(york, be called big apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(york, be called big apple state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(york, be called big apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(york, be called big apple state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(york, be called big apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(york, be called big apple state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(york, be referred as big apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be called apple)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be called apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be called big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, is big apple)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be called apple)