york: was such diverse place in late 1600s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.40
, washington
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, london
Weight: 0.34
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was such diverse place in late 1600s 1.00
is most important place 0.80
be popular place live in 0.78
be great place live 0.75
was unique 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york, be popular place live in)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(new york, be great place live)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(new york, is most important place)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was unique)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(new york, is most important place)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york, be popular place live in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was unique)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new york, be great place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new york, be popular place live in)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new york, be great place live)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, is most important place)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was unique)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, be great place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be popular place live in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york, be popular place live in)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(new york, be great place live)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(new york, is most important place)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was unique)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(new york city, be popular place live in)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(new york city, be popular place live in)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philadelphia, be great place live)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, be great place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(york, is most important place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(york, is most important place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(york, be popular place live in)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(york, be popular place live in)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(york, is most important place)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(york, was unique)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(york, was unique)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, be popular place live in)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(york, was unique)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(york, be popular place live in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(york, is most important place)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(york, was unique)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new york, was unique)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(new york, is most important place)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(new york, be popular place live in)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(new york, be great place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(philadelphia, be great place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new york city, be popular place live in)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(new york, is most important place)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(new york, be popular place live in)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new york, was unique)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(new york, be great place live)