young children: is delicious

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings poetry
Weight: 0.30
, literature
Weight: 0.30
, study
Weight: 0.29
, fiction
Weight: 0.29
, poem
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is delicious 1.00
is beautiful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poetry, is beautiful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(poetry, is beautiful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(poetry, is beautiful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(young children, is delicious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(young children, is delicious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(young children, is delicious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(young children, is delicious)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(poetry, is beautiful)