young man: prefer older women

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.83
, young people
Weight: 0.77
, woman
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.80
, son
Weight: 0.71
, boy
Weight: 0.70
, college student
Weight: 0.68
, teenager
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
prefer older women 1.00
prefer women 0.92
be turned on by older guys 0.80
were from higher-income families less likely than men from lower-income families 0.76
give up on women 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(young man, prefer older women)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, prefer women)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer women)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(young man, prefer older women)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(young man, prefer older women)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(young man, prefer women)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(young man, prefer women)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(young man, prefer women)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(young man, be turned on by older guys)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(young man, be turned on by older guys)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(young man, be turned on by older guys)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(young man, prefer women)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(young man, give up on women)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(young man, give up on women)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(young man, give up on women)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(young man, be turned on by older guys)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(young man, give up on women)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(young man, were from higher-income families less likely than men from lower-income families)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(young man, were from higher-income families less likely than men from lower-income families)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(young man, were from higher-income families less likely than men from lower-income families)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(young man, were from higher-income families less likely than men from lower-income families)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(young man, prefer older women)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, prefer women)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, prefer women)