yukon: be more expensive than tahoe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.52
, name
Weight: 0.47
, place
Weight: 0.46
, north america
Weight: 0.44
, region
Weight: 0.44
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.31
, south america
Weight: 0.31
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.30
, latin america
Weight: 0.30
, central america
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than tahoe 1.00
be cheaper than tahoes 0.87
be denali expensive 0.85
is expensive 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(domain name, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(domain name, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lake tahoe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be denali expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(yukon, be denali expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be cheaper than tahoes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(yukon, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yukon, be denali expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(yukon, be denali expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(yukon, be cheaper than tahoes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(yukon, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(yukon, be cheaper than tahoes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(yukon, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(yukon, be cheaper than tahoes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(yukon, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(yukon, be more expensive than tahoe)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(domain name, is expensive)