zimbabwe: be considered developing country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.52
, united states
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zambia
Weight: 0.36
, central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered developing country 1.00
be considered as developing country 0.99
is developing country 0.96
is developing 0.89
be considered country 0.89
be considered as country 0.88
be considered countries 0.85
is country 0.80
is world country 0.80
be considered poorest countries 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(united states, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(united states, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(united states, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is world country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(malta, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(united states, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(malta, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(nigeria, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(malta, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(malta, is country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(zambia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zambia, is country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(zambia, is world country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(zambia, is world country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(united states, is country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nigeria, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(malta, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(zambia, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zambia, is world country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(united states, is country)