zimbabwe: have unemployment rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.52
, united states
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zambia
Weight: 0.36
, central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have unemployment rate 1.00
have high unemployment rate 0.98
have high inflation 0.78
have inflation 0.78
has economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ethiopia, has economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ethiopia, has economy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ethiopia, has economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have high unemployment rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, have high unemployment rate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, has economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, have high unemployment rate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have high unemployment rate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, has economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have inflation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have high inflation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, have inflation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have high inflation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have inflation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, have high inflation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, have inflation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, have high inflation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, has economy)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have unemployment rate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ethiopia, has economy)