zoo: be bad for children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for children 1.00
benefit school children 0.85
be bad for world 0.78
be good for animails 0.77
be good for education 0.77
be considered bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for children)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for world)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for animails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(zoo, be bad for children)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for children)