zoo: be better than wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wild 1.00
resemble wild 0.81
do more harm than good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(zoo, be better than wild)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(zoo, resemble wild)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(zoo, resemble wild)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(zoo, do more harm than good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zoo, resemble wild)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(zoo, do more harm than good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(zoo, resemble wild)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(zoo, do more harm than good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, do more harm than good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be better than wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(zoo, be better than wild)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(zoo, be better than wild)