zoo: be harmful to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to animals 1.00
be beneficial for animals 0.90
be unhealthy for animals 0.89
affect animals 0.89
be bad to animals 0.88
cause animals 0.87
benefit humans animals 0.87
be bad for animals 0.87
be important for animals 0.87
be bad for endangered animals 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(zoo, affect animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be unhealthy for animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, affect animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(zoo, affect animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(zoo, cause animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(zoo, be unhealthy for animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be important for animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(zoo, cause animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(zoo, affect animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(zoo, be important for animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(zoo, cause animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(zoo, cause animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, be unhealthy for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(zoo, be important for animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zoo, be unhealthy for animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zoo, be important for animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(zoo, be harmful to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)