zoo: be in favor of animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in favor of animals 1.00
be important for animals 0.83
be good for animals 0.83
affect animals 0.83
be bad for animals 0.82
be bad to animals 0.82
be beneficial for animals 0.82
look after animals 0.82
be good places for animals 0.81
benefit humans animals 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(zoo, affect animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, affect animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(zoo, affect animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(zoo, be important for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(zoo, look after animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be important for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(zoo, look after animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(zoo, look after animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be beneficial for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(zoo, look after animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(zoo, affect animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(zoo, be important for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zoo, be important for animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(zoo, be in favor of animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be in favor of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)