zoologist: debate relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.60
, expert
Weight: 0.44
, thing
Weight: 0.42
, member
Weight: 0.38
, professional
Weight: 0.37
Siblings biologist
Weight: 0.37
, geneticist
Weight: 0.36
, ecologist
Weight: 0.35
, geologist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
debate relationship 1.00
debate relationship of mollusks 0.85
debate annelids 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(zoologist, debate relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(zoologist, debate relationship of mollusks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(zoologist, debate annelids)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(zoologist, debate annelids)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(zoologist, debate annelids)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zoologist, debate annelids)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(zoologist, debate relationship of mollusks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(zoologist, debate relationship of mollusks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(zoologist, debate relationship of mollusks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(zoologist, debate relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(zoologist, debate relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(zoologist, debate relationship)