appropriation: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents legislation
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, amount
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.56
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.62
, proposal
Weight: 0.33
, authorization
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(spending, is big)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(spending, is big)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spending, is big)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(spending, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(appropriation, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(appropriation, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is big)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spending, is big)