bear: be at wood

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, big dipper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wood 1.00
shit in wood 0.84
live on bamboo 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(creature, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at wood)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(creature, be at wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(panda, live on bamboo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(creature, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bear, be at wood)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bear, be at wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(panda, live on bamboo)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(panda, live on bamboo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bear, be at wood)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bear, shit in wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bear, shit in wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at wood)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(creature, be at wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(panda, live on bamboo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at wood)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bear, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(creature, be at wood)