bear: live in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in canada 1.00
be important to canada 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, live in canada)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be important to canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(polar bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(polar bear, live in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(polar bear, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be important to canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bear, live in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bear, be important to canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bear, be important to canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bear, be important to canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bear, be important to canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bear, live in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bear, live in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(polar bear, live in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bear, live in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(polar bear, be important to canada)