black bear: be kept on farms in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.86
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.81
, brown bear
Weight: 0.70
Siblings polar bear
Weight: 0.41
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, elephant
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.36
, cougar
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be kept on farms in china 1.00
be kept on farms 0.94
be important to china 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be important to china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(panda bear, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be important to china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(black bear, be kept on farms in china)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be kept on farms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(black bear, be kept on farms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be important to china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(black bear, be important to china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(black bear, be important to china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(black bear, be kept on farms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(black bear, be important to china)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(black bear, be kept on farms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be kept on farms in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(black bear, be kept on farms in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be kept on farms in china)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(panda bear, be important to china)