brown bear: has state facts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.69
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings polar bear
Weight: 0.75
, black bear
Weight: 0.70
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, red fox
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state facts 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(black bear, has state facts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(black bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(black bear, has state facts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(brown bear, has state facts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, has state facts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(brown bear, has state facts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, has state facts)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(black bear, has state facts)