intestine: has size large

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.69
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.64
, organ
Weight: 0.64
, body part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings large intestine
Weight: 0.73
, small intestine
Weight: 0.40
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has size large 1.00
has size small 0.97
be called large 0.86
compare in size 0.83
be called small 0.80
be longer than large 0.79
is sizes 0.79
compare in size of frog 0.79
have large surface area 0.79
is different sizes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, has size large)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, has size small)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, have large surface area)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, has size large)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, has size small)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, be called large)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called small)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(large intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(large intestine, has size large)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(small intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(small intestine, has size large)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(small intestine, has size small)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(small intestine, has size small)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(large intestine, has size small)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(large intestine, has size small)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(large intestine, be called large)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(large intestine, be called large)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(small intestine, be called small)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called small)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(small intestine, have large surface area)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(small intestine, have large surface area)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than large)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size of frog)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(small intestine, compare in size of frog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(intestine, has size large)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(intestine, has size small)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(intestine, has size small)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intestine, has size small)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size small)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(intestine, be called large)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(intestine, be called small)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(intestine, be called large)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be called large)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(intestine, be called large)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(intestine, be longer than large)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(intestine, is different sizes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(intestine, have large surface area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(intestine, is different sizes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(intestine, be called small)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(intestine, be called small)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be called small)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(intestine, have large surface area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(intestine, is different sizes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intestine, be longer than large)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(intestine, have large surface area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intestine, be longer than large)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be longer than large)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intestine, have large surface area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intestine, is different sizes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(intestine, has size large)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(large intestine, has size large)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(small intestine, has size small)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(small intestine, has size large)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(large intestine, has size small)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(large intestine, be called large)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called small)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(small intestine, have large surface area)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size of frog)