aaa: be dry cleaners

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, company
Weight: 0.52
, travel agent
Weight: 0.52
, group
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, american express
Weight: 0.32
, oh
Weight: 0.32
, florence
Weight: 0.32
, ac
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dry cleaners 1.00
be organic dry cleaners 0.95
be cleaners 0.94
be organic cleaners 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(aaa, be dry cleaners)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aaa, be organic dry cleaners)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(aaa, be cleaners)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(aaa, be organic dry cleaners)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aaa, be cleaners)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(aaa, be organic cleaners)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(aaa, be cleaners)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(aaa, be organic dry cleaners)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aaa, be organic dry cleaners)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(aaa, be organic cleaners)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(aaa, be organic cleaners)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(aaa, be cleaners)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(aaa, be organic cleaners)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(aaa, be dry cleaners)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aaa, be dry cleaners)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(aaa, be dry cleaners)