abdominal: pain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aneurysm
Weight: 0.46
, muscle
Weight: 0.44
, pain
Weight: 0.36
, body
Weight: 0.35
, spine
Weight: 0.35
Siblings oblique
Weight: 0.36
, triceps
Weight: 0.32
, biceps
Weight: 0.31
, cardiac muscle
Weight: 0.31
, deltoid
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
pain 1.00
has state pain 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(muscle, pain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(abdominal, pain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(muscle, pain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(muscle, pain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(muscle, pain)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(abdominal, pain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(abdominal, pain)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, has state pain)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(abdominal, has state pain)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(abdominal, has state pain)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(abdominal, has state pain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, pain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(abdominal, pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(muscle, pain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(abdominal, pain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(muscle, pain)