abrasion: is blurry vision

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trauma
Weight: 0.60
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, effect
Weight: 0.54
, chemical
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scratch
Weight: 0.56
, callus
Weight: 0.42
, laceration
Weight: 0.35
, fracture
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is blurry vision 1.00
be blurred vision 0.93
is vision 0.87
be blurred lines 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(abrasion, is blurry vision)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(abrasion, is vision)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(abrasion, is vision)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(abrasion, be blurred vision)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(abrasion, be blurred vision)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(abrasion, is vision)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(abrasion, be blurred vision)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(abrasion, be blurred lines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, be blurred vision)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(abrasion, be blurred lines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, be blurred lines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abrasion, be blurred lines)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, is vision)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, is blurry vision)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, is blurry vision)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(abrasion, is blurry vision)