absinthe: poured over sugar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beverage
Weight: 0.62
, spirit
Weight: 0.61
, drink
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, hallucinogen
Weight: 0.51
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.35
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.35
, white wine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
poured over sugar 1.00
poured out of carton flow 0.84
have sugar 0.82
have more sugar 0.82
be with sugar 0.81
contain sugar 0.80
poured out of carton flow irregularly 0.80
served with sugar 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beverage, contain sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(absinthe, poured over sugar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(beverage, contain sugar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(beverage, contain sugar)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(white wine, have sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(white wine, have more sugar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beverage, contain sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(white wine, have sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(white wine, have sugar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(white wine, have more sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(white wine, have more sugar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(absinthe, poured over sugar)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(absinthe, be with sugar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(absinthe, be with sugar)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(absinthe, served with sugar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, be with sugar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(absinthe, served with sugar)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(absinthe, poured over sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beverage, contain sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(white wine, have sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(white wine, have more sugar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(absinthe, poured over sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beverage, contain sugar)