academic: benefit from idea like papertrail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
Siblings financial institution
Weight: 0.35
, secondary school
Weight: 0.34
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, institute
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit from idea like papertrail 1.00
benefit from idea 0.98
benefit having 0.84
be drawn to idea 0.80
benefit children 0.79
support theory 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(activity, benefit children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(activity, support theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(activity, support theory)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(activity, benefit children)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(activity, benefit children)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, support theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(activity, benefit children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(activity, support theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(academic, benefit from idea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(academic, benefit from idea)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(academic, benefit from idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(activity, support theory)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(activity, benefit children)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(activity, support theory)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(academic, benefit from idea like papertrail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(activity, benefit children)