acceleration: be directly proportional to net force

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.62
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
Siblings compression
Weight: 0.34
, amplitude
Weight: 0.33
, interest rate
Weight: 0.32
, displacement
Weight: 0.32
, reduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be directly proportional to net force 1.00
be directly proportional to force 0.95
is directly proportional 0.91
be directly proportional to acceleration 0.88
is proportional 0.85
be directly proportional to displacement 0.85
be directly proportional to displacement in motion 0.83
be directly proportional to displacement in simple motion 0.83
be directly proportional to displacement in harmonic motion 0.79
be proportional to displacement 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(displacement, be directly proportional to acceleration)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(displacement, be directly proportional to acceleration)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(displacement, be directly proportional to acceleration)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(acceleration, be directly proportional to force)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(acceleration, be directly proportional to force)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(acceleration, be directly proportional to force)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acceleration, be directly proportional to force)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(acceleration, be directly proportional to net force)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(displacement, be directly proportional to acceleration)