acceptance: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.60
, change
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, achievement
Weight: 0.56
Siblings recognition
Weight: 0.33
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.32
, success
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, enthusiasm
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be important in friendship 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, be important in relationship)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, be important in friendship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loyalty, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(loyalty, be important in relationship)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loyalty, be important in friendship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(loyalty, be important in friendship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(acceptance, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(acceptance, be important in friendship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(acceptance, be important in friendship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(acceptance, be important in friendship)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important in friendship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acceptance, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(loyalty, be important in relationship)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(loyalty, be important in friendship)