access: be to information necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.59
Siblings easement
Weight: 0.59
, key
Weight: 0.57
, egress
Weight: 0.40
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.35
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to information necessary 1.00
be to information important 0.94
be to information 0.93
is necessary 0.82
need evidence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(easement, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(easement, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(easement, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(access, be to information necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(access, be to information)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(access, be to information important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(access, be to information)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(access, be to information)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(access, is necessary)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(access, be to information necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(access, be to information necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(access, be to information necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(easement, is necessary)