accident: be fatal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings car accident
Weight: 0.77
, crash
Weight: 0.70
, spill
Weight: 0.66
, bad weather
Weight: 0.65
, shipwreck
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fatal 1.00
result in fatality 0.79
be serious accident 0.79
cause injury and death 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(car accident, be fatal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(car accident, be serious accident)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(car accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(car accident, be fatal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(car accident, be serious accident) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(car accident, be serious accident)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(accident, be fatal)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(accident, result in fatality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(accident, cause injury and death)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(accident, result in fatality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(accident, result in fatality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(accident, cause injury and death)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(accident, be fatal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(accident, be fatal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(car accident, be fatal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(accident, be fatal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(car accident, be serious accident)