accident: hurt person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings car accident
Weight: 0.77
, crash
Weight: 0.70
, spill
Weight: 0.66
, bad weather
Weight: 0.65
, shipwreck
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt person 1.00
happen to person 0.76
happen to anybody 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(crash, hurt person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(crash, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(crash, hurt person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(accident, hurt person)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(accident, happen to anybody)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(accident, happen to person)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(accident, happen to anybody)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accident, happen to anybody)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(accident, happen to person)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(accident, happen to person)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(accident, happen to person)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(accident, happen to anybody)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accident, hurt person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(accident, hurt person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accident, hurt person)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crash, hurt person)