accountant: is work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is work 1.00
is good job 0.78
work long hours 0.77
has state job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(banker, work long hours)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(banker, work long hours) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(banker, work long hours)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(accountant, is work)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(accountant, work long hours)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is good job)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accountant, has state job)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(accountant, has state job)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(accountant, work long hours)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(accountant, is good job)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(accountant, has state job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(accountant, is good job)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(accountant, work long hours)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(accountant, has state job)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, is good job)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(accountant, work long hours)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(accountant, is work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(banker, work long hours)