accounting firm: is needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.80
, business
Weight: 0.73
, company
Weight: 0.67
, third party
Weight: 0.64
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.51
, software company
Weight: 0.38
, oil company
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is needed 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cpa, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cpa, is needed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cpa, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(accounting firm, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(accounting firm, is needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(accounting firm, is needed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cpa, is needed)