acquisition: fail course hero

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents development
Weight: 0.69
, share
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.63
, business activity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings deal
Weight: 0.65
, purchase
Weight: 0.62
, takeover
Weight: 0.50
, merger
Weight: 0.36
, partnership
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail course hero 1.00
fail 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(partnership, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(merger, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(takeover, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(partnership, fail)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(partnership, fail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(merger, fail)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(merger, fail)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(takeover, fail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(takeover, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(acquisition, fail course hero)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(acquisition, fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(acquisition, fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(acquisition, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(acquisition, fail course hero)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(partnership, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(merger, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail course hero)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(takeover, fail)