acquisition: has state jobs

Related concepts

Parents	development Weight: 0.69 , share Weight: 0.64 , agreement Weight: 0.63 , business activity Weight: 0.63
Siblings	deal Weight: 0.65 , purchase Weight: 0.62 , takeover Weight: 0.50 , merger Weight: 0.36 , partnership Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state jobs	1.00
jobs	0.94
is layoffs	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(development, jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(acquisition, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(development, jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(development, jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(merger, is layoffs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(development, jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(acquisition, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(merger, is layoffs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(merger, is layoffs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(acquisition, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(acquisition, jobs)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(acquisition, jobs)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(acquisition, jobs)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(acquisition, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(acquisition, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(development, jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(merger, is layoffs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(acquisition, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(development, jobs)