acrylic: hurt day

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt day 1.00
hurt first day 0.96
hurt 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pvc, hurt)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, hurt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pvc, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pvc, hurt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fiberglass, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, hurt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(acrylic, hurt day)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(acrylic, hurt first day)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(acrylic, hurt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(acrylic, hurt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt first day)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(acrylic, hurt first day)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(acrylic, hurt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(acrylic, hurt first day)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, hurt day)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pvc, hurt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiberglass, hurt)