:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pvc, hurt)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, hurt)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pvc, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pvc, hurt)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(acrylic, hurt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(acrylic, hurt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(acrylic, hurt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pvc, hurt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, hurt day)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiberglass, hurt)