act in play: be motivated by experience interpretation of your role

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be motivated by experience interpretation of your role 1.00
causes you win lead role 0.82
be motivated by you believe in character 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(act in play, causes you win lead role)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(act in play, be motivated by you believe in character)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(act in play, causes you win lead role)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(act in play, causes you win lead role)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(act in play, causes you win lead role)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(act in play, be motivated by you believe in character)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(act in play, be motivated by you believe in character)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(act in play, be motivated by you believe in character)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(act in play, be motivated by experience interpretation of your role)