acting: be in twin peaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents craft
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, performance
Weight: 0.57
, job
Weight: 0.56
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, exercising
Weight: 0.32
, singing
Weight: 0.32
, puppet
Weight: 0.31
, speaking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in twin peaks 1.00
be in twin peaks bad 0.99
be in peaks 0.93
be in peaks bad 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(acting, be in twin peaks)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(acting, be in twin peaks bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(acting, be in twin peaks bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(acting, be in twin peaks bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(acting, be in twin peaks bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(acting, be in peaks bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(acting, be in peaks bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(acting, be in peaks bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(acting, be in peaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(acting, be in peaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(acting, be in peaks bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(acting, be in peaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(acting, be in peaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(acting, be in twin peaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(acting, be in twin peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(acting, be in twin peaks)