action: negatively impact ocean ecosystems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.62
, motion
Weight: 0.60
, reaction
Weight: 0.59
, appeal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings resolution
Weight: 0.69
, strike
Weight: 0.66
, raid
Weight: 0.64
, crusade
Weight: 0.64
, inaction
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
negatively impact ocean ecosystems 1.00
affect environment 0.83
increase capacity of ecosystems 0.82
increase carrying capacity of ecosystems 0.79
affect humans 0.77
upset balance of ecosystem 0.76
be important to organisms 0.76
have global effects 0.76
affect economy 0.76
be important to living organisms 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(reaction, be important to living organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(reaction, be important to living organisms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be important to living organisms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(reaction, be important to living organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(strike, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strike, affect economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(action, increase carrying capacity of ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(action, increase carrying capacity of ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(action, increase carrying capacity of ecosystems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(action, have global effects)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(action, increase carrying capacity of ecosystems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(action, upset balance of ecosystem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(action, have global effects)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(action, upset balance of ecosystem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(action, upset balance of ecosystem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(action, affect environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(action, affect humans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(action, upset balance of ecosystem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(action, have global effects)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(action, have global effects)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reaction, be important to living organisms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(strike, affect economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reaction, be important to living organisms)