action: result in reaction

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.59
, appeal
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.66
, strike
Weight: 0.66
, inaction
Weight: 0.64
, play
Weight: 0.64
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
result in reaction 1.00
be one kind of response 0.83
has consequence 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(reaction, be one kind of response) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(action, result in reaction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(reaction, be one kind of response)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be one kind of response)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(reaction, be one kind of response) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(action, result in reaction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(action, result in reaction)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(action, has consequence)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(action, has consequence)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(action, has consequence)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(action, has consequence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(action, result in reaction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(action, result in reaction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(reaction, be one kind of response)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(action, result in reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(reaction, be one kind of response)