activist: spoil fun in everything

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.58
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lawyer
Weight: 0.71
, blogger
Weight: 0.66
, scientist
Weight: 0.66
, judge
Weight: 0.65
, founder
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
spoil fun in everything 1.00
is crazy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(activist, spoil fun in everything)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(activist, is crazy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(activist, is crazy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(activist, is crazy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(activist, is crazy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(activist, spoil fun in everything)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(activist, spoil fun in everything)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(activist, spoil fun in everything)