activity: affect plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect plants 1.00
affect greenhouse effect 0.80
affect other organisms 0.78
affect people 0.78
affect businesses 0.77
affect soil 0.77
affect business 0.76
affect antarctica 0.76
affect ecosystems 0.76
affect greenhouse gas layer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crime, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(activity, affect plants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, affect people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crime, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(activity, affect plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(activity, affect plants)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(activity, affect other organisms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(activity, affect other organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(activity, affect other organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect other organisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(activity, affect plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, affect people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(activity, affect plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, affect people)