activity: affect rates of erosion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect rates of erosion 1.00
effect rate of soil erosion 0.90
affect process of erosion 0.89
affect rates 0.89
contribute to erosion 0.87
affect natural process of erosion 0.86
affect rate 0.86
contribute to soil erosion 0.83
effect rate 0.80
increase risk of flooding 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(activity, contribute to soil erosion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(activity, contribute to erosion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(activity, affect natural process of erosion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(activity, contribute to soil erosion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(activity, increase risk of flooding)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect natural process of erosion)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(activity, affect natural process of erosion)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(activity, affect natural process of erosion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(activity, increase risk of flooding)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(activity, contribute to erosion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to soil erosion)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(activity, contribute to soil erosion)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(activity, increase risk of flooding)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to erosion)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(activity, contribute to erosion)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(activity, increase risk of flooding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)