activity: be among most beneficial type of activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be among most beneficial type of activity 1.00
be among most beneficial type 0.95
be among type of activity 0.95
be among beneficial type 0.94
be among type 0.88
be beneficial to society 0.78
be more common in areas 0.78
be beneficial to economy 0.77
happen in certain areas 0.76
is types 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(property, be beneficial to economy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(crime, happen in certain areas)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(crime, happen in certain areas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(property, be beneficial to economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(property, be beneficial to economy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(crime, happen in certain areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drug use, is types)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(property, be beneficial to economy)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(crime, happen in certain areas)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(drug use, is types)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drug use, is types)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(crime, happen in certain areas)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(property, be beneficial to economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(drug use, is types)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(crime, happen in certain areas)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(property, be beneficial to economy)