activity: interrelated in mathematics instruction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
interrelated in mathematics instruction 1.00
be important in math 0.84
be important in science 0.77
be on education important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(property, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(property, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(property, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(spending, be on education important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(property, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(spending, be on education important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(spending, be on education important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(property, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spending, be on education important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(property, be important in science)