activity: lead to global warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
lead to global warming 1.00
lead to warming 0.94
affect global warming 0.92
cause global warming 0.92
give rise to global warming 0.91
contribute to global warming 0.90
affect warming 0.85
cause warming 0.85
give rise to warming 0.84
contribute to warming 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(motor vehicle, contribute to global warming)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(motor vehicle, contribute to warming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(motor vehicle, contribute to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(motor vehicle, contribute to global warming)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(motor vehicle, contribute to warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(motor vehicle, contribute to warming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(activity, lead to global warming)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(activity, give rise to global warming)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(activity, contribute to global warming)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(activity, cause global warming)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(activity, cause global warming)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(activity, give rise to global warming)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(activity, cause global warming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(activity, cause global warming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to global warming)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(activity, give rise to global warming)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(activity, contribute to global warming)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(activity, contribute to global warming)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(activity, give rise to global warming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(activity, lead to global warming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(motor vehicle, contribute to global warming)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(activity, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(motor vehicle, contribute to warming)