activity: occur in ring of fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
occur in ring of fire 1.00
occur in ring 0.93
occur 0.78
change after fire 0.78
occur in areas 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(crime, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(activity, occur in ring of fire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(crime, occur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(crime, occur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spending, change after fire)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(crime, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(activity, occur in ring of fire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spending, change after fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(spending, change after fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(activity, occur in ring of fire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(activity, occur in ring of fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(activity, occur in ring of fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(crime, occur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(spending, change after fire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(activity, occur in ring of fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(crime, occur)