actor: be at play

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, kim
Weight: 0.54
, eric
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at play 1.00
be play in play 0.99
play part 0.92
act in play 0.86
star in play 0.83
be different from role he play 0.79
play ball with opposition 0.78
act scene in play 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(politician, play ball with opposition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(politician, play ball with opposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(politician, play ball with opposition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(actor, be at play)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(actor, be play in play)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(actor, play part)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(actor, be play in play)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(actor, be play in play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(actor, play part)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(actor, be play in play)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(actor, act in play)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(actor, star in play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(actor, be different from role he play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(actor, play part)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(actor, act in play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(actor, act scene in play)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(actor, star in play)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actor, be different from role he play)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(actor, star in play)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(actor, act scene in play)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(actor, act in play)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(actor, act in play)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(actor, star in play)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(actor, be different from role he play)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(actor, act scene in play)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(actor, act scene in play)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(actor, be different from role he play)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(actor, play part)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(actor, be at play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(politician, play ball with opposition)