actor: be at television

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, kim
Weight: 0.54
, eric
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at television 1.00
wants to watch television show 0.89
star in television show 0.88
be associate with tv 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(actor, be at television)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be associate with tv)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be associate with tv)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(actor, be at television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(actor, be at television)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(actor, wants to watch television show)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(actor, star in television show)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(actor, star in television show)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(actor, wants to watch television show)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(actor, wants to watch television show)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at television)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(actor, be at television)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with tv)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(actor, be at television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with tv)