actor: be compensated for movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be compensated for movies 1.00
be compensated for hatian movies 1.00
be paid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(actor, be compensated for movies)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(actor, be compensated for hatian movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(actor, be compensated for hatian movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(actor, be compensated for hatian movies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(actor, be compensated for hatian movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(actor, be paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(actor, be paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(actor, be paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(actor, be paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(actor, be compensated for movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(actor, be compensated for movies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(actor, be compensated for movies)